Figure 1 1: Urological Device Market Share Ranking by Segment, Japan, 2019 3
Figure 1 2: Companies Researched in this Report, Japan, 2019 4
Figure 1 3: Factors Impacting the Urological Device Market by Segment, Japan 5
Figure 1 4: Recent Events in the Urological Device Market, 2017 – 2019 (1 of 2) 6
Figure 1 5: Recent Events in the Urological Device Market, 2017 – 2019 (2 of 2) 7
Figure 1 6: Urological Procedures Covered, Japan 8
Figure 1 7: Urological Device Markets Covered, Japan (1 of 2) 9
Figure 1 8: Urological Device Markets Covered, Japan (2 of 2) 10
Figure 1 9: Key Report Updates 11
Figure 1 10: Version History 11
Figure 3 1: Urinary Incontinence Treatments by Company (1 of 3) 55
Figure 3 2: Urinary Incontinence Treatments by Company (2 of 3) 56
Figure 3 3: Urinary Incontinence Treatments by Company (3 of 3) 57
Figure 3 4: Stone Management Devices by Company (1 of 3) 64
Figure 3 5: Stone Management Devices by Company (2 of 3) 65
Figure 3 6: Stone Management Devices by Company (3 of 3) 66
Figure 3 7: BPH Treatments by Company 75
Figure 3 8: Erectile Dysfunction Devices by Company 78
Figure 3 9: Class 2 Device Recall Auriga Laser System 79
Figure 3 10: Class 2 Device Recall Fiber Strippers and Cleavers 80
Figure 3 11: Class 2 Device Recall StarMedTec LightTrail Reusable Fibers 81
Figure 3 12: Class 2 Device Recall Malecot Catheter Set 81
Figure 3 13: Class 2 Device Recall Encore(TM) 26 Inflation Device 81
Figure 3 14: Class 2 Device Recall Bardex Lubricath 3Way 75cc Continuous Irrigation Foley Catheter 82
Figure 3 15: Class 2 Device Recall Intermittent Catheters 82
Figure 3 16: Class 2 Device Recall leg bag 82
Figure 3 17: Class 2 Device Recall SURESTEP 83
Figure 3 18: Class 2 Device Recall PureWick External Catheter 83
Figure 3 19: Class 2 Device Recall SURESTEP Tray, BARDEX I.C. COMPLETE CARE, Urine Meter, Temperature STATLOCK Stabilization Device 83
Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall BARD Irrigation Syringe, Rx Only, Sterile 84
Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall Magic3 84
Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall Optionvm Urinary Catheter. Male use only. Latex Free. Sterile, Rx only. 84
Figure 3 23: Class 3 Device Recall SureStep Tray, with AddaFoley 85
Figure 3 24: Class 2 Device Recall BARDEX 85
Figure 3 25: Class 3 Device Recall BARD Toomey Irrigation Syringe 70cc 85
Figure 3 26: Class 3 Device Recall Antibacterial Hydro Personal Catheter 85
Figure 3 27: Class 2 Device Recall Magic3 Intermittent Catheter with Sure Grip Hydrophilic Coated Silicone Coude tip 86
Figure 3 28: Class 2 Device Recall Magic3 Hydrophiliccoated Female Intermittent Catheter 86
Figure 3 29: Class 2 Device Recall Bard 100 LatexFree Urinary Drainage Bag with AntiReflux Chamber and Bard EXLok Sampling 86
Figure 3 30: Class 2 Device Recall Bard Dimension Stone Basket 87
Figure 3 31: Class 2 Device Recall CMax 87
Figure 3 32: Class 2 Device Recall Bard BrachySource Seed Implants 87
Figure 3 33: Class 2 Device Recall I125 CE Marked QuickLink Cartridges 88
Figure 3 34: Class 2 Device Recall Bard 88
Figure 3 35: Class 2 Device Recall XForce Nephrostomy Balloon Dilation Catheter Kit with Inflation Device 89
Figure 3 36: Class 2 Device Recall SelfCath Pediatric Catheter 90
Figure 3 37: Class 2 Device Recall Coloplast Conveen Urine Collection Leg Bag 90
Figure 3 38: Class 2 Device Recall Genesis Malleable Penile Prosthesis 90
Figure 3 39: Class 2 Device Recall StoneBreaker 91
Figure 3 40: Class 2 Device Recall OptiLite MultiUse Holmium Laser Fibers 91
Figure 3 41: Class 2 Device Recall Cook MultiUse Holmium Laser Fibers 92
Figure 3 42: Class 2 Device Recall Cook Bush 92
Figure 3 43: Class 2 Device Recall Aprima" Access Nonvascular Introducer Set 92
Figure 3 44: Class 2 Device Recall Ascend AQ 93
Figure 3 45: Class 2 Device Recall Oncentra Brachy 4.5 94
Figure 3 46: Class 2 Device Recall Oncentra External Beam Treatment Planning Software 94
Figure 3 47: Class 2 Device Recall Oncentra External Beam Treatment Planning Software 94
Figure 3 48: Class 2 Device Recall Oncentra Brachy treatment planning system 94
Figure 3 49: Class 2 Device Recall STORZ High Flow Insufflation Tubing (with filter) 95
Figure 3 50: Class 2 Device Recall Image1 SPIES XLINK Camera Control Unit (CCU) 95
Figure 3 51: Class 2 Device Recall Ureteroreno Videoscope & Fiberscope 96
Figure 3 52: Class 2 Device Recall A20975A: Working insert, with ramp, one way; A20976A: Bridge, one way; A20977A; Bridge, two way 96
Figure 3 53: Class 2 Device Recall Olympus High Freqency Resection Electrodes 96
Figure 3 54: Class 2 Device Recall Ureteroreno videoscope URFV2 and URFV2R 97
Figure 3 55: Class 2 Device Recall HF Cable WA00014A 97
Figure 3 56: Post Market Study Of Single Incision Sling Versus Transobturator Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence (Solyx) 98
Figure 3 57: Mid-Urethral Sling Tensioning Trial (MUST) 98
Figure 3 58: Prospective Registry for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence 99
Figure 3 59: Stop or Ongoing Oral Anticoagulation in Patients Undergoing Pvp (SOAP) (SOAP) 99
Figure 3 60: LithoVue Single Use Disposable Ureteroscope 100
Figure 3 61: Comparing Treatment of Urolithiasis Between Disposable and Reusable Ureteroscope 100
Figure 3 62: Indwelling Stent Discoloration Project 101
Figure 3 63: Reduction of Stent Associated Morbidity by Minimizing Stent Material. 101
Figure 3 64: PROPPER Prospective Registry of Outcomes With Penile Prosthesis (PROPPER) 102
Figure 3 65: Patient Satisfaction During Outpatient Versus Inpatient Foley Catheter Induction of Labor 103
Figure 3 66: Foley Catheter vs a Self-contained Valved Urinary Catheter 103
Figure 3 67: Bladder Morphology Using 2 Different Catheter Designs 104
Figure 3 68: Outpatient Labor Induction With the Transcervical Foley Balloon 104
Figure 3 69: Medical and Economic Evaluation for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer (GETUGP05) 105
Figure 3 70: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Transperineal Targeted Biopsy Compared to Standard Transrectal Biopsy 105
Figure 3 71: Product Evaluation of a Newly Developed Intermittent Catheter. 106
Figure 3 72: Clinical Study Investigating Safety and Performance of a New Urinary Intermittent Catheter in Healthy Volunteers 106
Figure 3 73: Clinical Study Investigating Safety and Performance of a New Urinary Intermittent Catheters in Healthy Volunteers 106
Figure 3 74: Virtue® European Study 107
Figure 3 75: Exploratory Study Investigating Urodynamic Parameters During Catheterisation 107
Figure 3 76: Altis® 522 Trial - Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence 107
Figure 3 77: The European Study of Altis Single Incision Sling System for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (EASY) 108
Figure 3 78: Do Hydrophilic Catheters Decrease Pain and Discomfort of a Patient During Urodynamic Study (HYDRUDS) 108
Figure 3 79: Efficacy Study of Antimicrobial Catheters to Avoid Urinary Infections in Spinal Cord Injured Patients (ESCALE) 108
Figure 3 80: Ureteral Stent Study 109
Figure 3 81: Impact Ureteral Sheath Design During Ureteroscopy 109
Figure 3 82: Optimization of Ureterolysis During Hysterectomy 110
Figure 3 83: Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy With Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure 110
Figure 3 84: Evaluation Of Transperineal Ultrasound For Image Guidance In The Treatment Of Prostate Cancer in Men Following Prostatectomy 111
Figure 3 85: Use of Non-invasive 4D Ultrasound Clarity System in Prostate IMRT/RapidArc Therapy 111
Figure 3 86: Single Fraction Real-time High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in Patients With Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer (SINFRA_PROST) 112
Figure 3 87: Dose Escalation to Dominant Intraprostatic Lesions (DIL) With MRI-TRUS Fusion High Dose Rate (HDR) Prostate Brachytherapy (BRAPROST) 112
Figure 3 88: Combined Treatment for Mixed Incontinence (ESTEEM) 113
Figure 3 89: TVT-ABBREVO Versus SERASIS for the Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence: 1 Year Outcomes of a Comparative Study With 2 Trans-obturator Sub Mid Urethral Slings 113
Figure 3 90: Trans-obturator Mid-urethral Sling and the Single-incision Sling in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence 114
Figure 3 91: Low-energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Treatment for Patients After Radical Prostatectomy 115
Figure 3 92: Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Vacuum Erectile Device as a Treatment for Peyronies Disease 115
Figure 3 93: Safety and Effect of Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) on the Renal Allograft in Transplant Recipients. 116
Figure 3 94: Low Energy Shockwave Therapy (LE-SWT): A Novel Treatment for Chronic Kidney Disease 116
Figure 3 95: Narrow Versus Wide Focal Zones for Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal Calculi 116
Figure 3 96: Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones? 117
Figure 3 97: Durability of Flexible Ureteroscopes and Causes of Infection During Flexible Ureterorenoscopy 117
Figure 3 98: Comparison of Different Energy Sources During TUR-P 117
Figure 3 99: Effects of Flexible Ureteroscopy on Renal Blood Flow 118
Figure 3 100: A Study of Blue Light Flexible Cystoscopy With Cysview in the Detection of Bladder Cancer in the Surveillance Setting 118
Figure 3 101: Blue Light Cystoscopy With Cysview® Registry (BLCCR) 118
Figure 3 102: Safety Study of Bipolar Versus Monopolar Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors 119
Figure 3 103: Multi-Center Comparison of Dual Lumen Versus Single Lumen Ureteroscopes 119
Figure 3 104: T-DOC® 5 Fr Pediatric Clinical Investigation 120
Figure 3 105: Air vs Water Catheters (AvW (Bonn)) 120
Figure 3 106: A Human Factor Study To Asses The Usability And Feasibility Of The Peritron+ During Intended Use 120
Figure 3 107: Portable Pves Study 121
Figure 3 108: Ambulatory Pessary Trial 121
Figure 3 109: Study to Compare CAUTI Rates Following ERASE CAUTI Tray Non-Silver vs Silver Coated Foley Catheters 122
Figure 3 110: Study to Compare CAUTI Rates Following ERASE CAUTI Tray Silver vs Silver Coated Foley Catheters 122
Figure 3 111: Trial Comparing Three Different Devices for Kidney Stone Removal During Percutaneous Surgery 123
Figure 3 112: Quality of Life in Kidney Stone Patients Undergoing Surgery 123
Figure 3 113: Prostate Vaporization Techniques in Canadian Hospital 124
Figure 3 114: Treatment of Symptomatic BPH Patients Undergoing Anticoagulant Therapy Using the PlasmaButton Vaporization Electrode 124
Figure 3 115: Assessment of Infection Control, Practice Efficiency, and Health Economics of Sheathed Versus Standard Cystoscopy 125
Figure 3 116: Results of Safety Guidewire Use in Ureteroscopic Stone Surgery 125
Figure 3 117: Transurethral En Bloc Versus Standard Resection of Bladder Tumour 125
Figure 3 118: PlasmaKinetic (PK) Button Vaporization Electrode for Treatment of Bladder Tumors (PK Button) 126
Figure 4 1: Currency Exchange Rate, 2019 129
Figure 4 2: Urological Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 131
Figure 4 3: Urological Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (JP¥M) 132
Figure 4 4: Urological Device Market Growth by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 137
Figure 4 5: Drivers and Limiters, Urological Device Market, Japan, 2019 142
Figure 4 6: Leading Competitors, Urological Device Market, Japan, 2019 148
Figure 4 7: SWOT Analysis, Boston Scientific (1 of 2) 164
Figure 4 8: SWOT Analysis, Boston Scientific (2 of 2) 165
Figure 4 9: SWOT Analysis, C. R. Bard (Becton Dickinson) (1 of 2) 166
Figure 4 10: SWOT Analysis, C. R. Bard (Becton Dickinson) (2 of 2) 167
Figure 4 11: SWOT Analysis, Coloplast 168
Figure 4 12: SWOT Analysis, Cook Medical (1 of 2) 169
Figure 4 13: SWOT Analysis, Cook Medical (2 of 2) 170
Figure 4 14: SWOT Analysis, Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson) 171
Figure 4 15: SWOT Analysis, Karl Storz 172
Figure 4 16: SWOT Analysis, LABORIE 173
Figure 4 17: SWOT Analysis, Olympus (1 of 2) 174
Figure 4 18: SWOT Analysis, Olympus (2 of 2) 175
Figure 5 1: Urological Procedures by Type, Japan, 2016 – 2026 177
Figure 5 2: Urinary Incontinence Procedures by Type, Japan, 2016 – 2026 181
Figure 5 3: Male Incontinence Management Procedures by Type, Japan, 2016 – 2026 183
Figure 5 4: Female Incontinence Management Procedures by Type, Japan, 2016 – 2026 186
Figure 5 5: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Procedures by Type, Japan, 2016 – 2026 188
Figure 5 6: Stone Management Procedures by Type, Japan, 2016 – 2026 191
Figure 5 7: ESWL Procedures, Japan, 2016 – 2026 193
Figure 5 8: Transurethral Procedures by Type, Japan, 2016 – 2026 195
Figure 5 9: Ureteral Stent Placement Procedures, Japan, 2016 – 2026 197
Figure 5 10: PCNL Procedures, Japan, 2016 – 2026 199
Figure 5 11: BPH Procedures by Type, Japan, 2016 – 2026 202
Figure 5 12: Erectile Dysfunction Management Procedures by Type, Japan, 2016 – 2026 205
Figure 6 1: Urinary Incontinence Management Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 210
Figure 6 2: Urinary Incontinence Management Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (JP¥M) 210
Figure 6 3: Urinary Catheter Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 215
Figure 6 4: Urinary Catheter Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (JP¥M) 215
Figure 6 5: Intermittent Catheter Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 217
Figure 6 6: Foley Catheter Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 219
Figure 6 7: Male External Catheter Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 221
Figure 6 8: Incontinence Management Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 225
Figure 6 9: Incontinence Management Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (JP¥M) 225
Figure 6 10: Female Incontinence Sling Market by Type, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 228
Figure 6 11: Female Incontinence Sling Market by Type, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (JP¥M) 228
Figure 6 12: Total Female Incontinence Sling Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 230
Figure 6 13: Transvaginal Tape Female Incontinence Sling Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 232
Figure 6 14: Transobturator Female Incontinence Sling Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 234
Figure 6 15: Male Implantable Incontinence Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 – 2025 (US$M) 237
Figure 6 16: Male Implantable Incontinence Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 – 2025 (JP¥M) 237
Figure 6 17: Total Male Implantable Incontinence Device Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 239
Figure 6 18: Male Incontinence Sling Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 241
Figure 6 19: Male Artificial Urinary Sphincter Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 243
Figure 6 20: Drivers and Limiters, Urinary Incontinence Management Device Market, Japan, 2019 247
Figure 6 21: Leading Competitors, Urinary Incontinence Management Device Market, Japan, 2018 251
Figure 7 1: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 256
Figure 7 2: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (JP¥M) 256
Figure 7 3: Total Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Device Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 261
Figure 7 4: Transvaginal Mesh Market, Australia, 2013 – 2023 263
Figure 7 5: Sacrocolpopexy Mesh Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 265
Figure 7 6: Drivers and Limiters, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Market, Japan, 2019 268
Figure 7 7: Leading Competitors, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Market, Japan, 2019 270
Figure 8 1: Stone Management Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 276
Figure 8 2: Stone Management Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (JP¥M) 277
Figure 8 3: ESWL Equipment Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 282
Figure 8 4: ISWL Equipment Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 284
Figure 8 5: Holmium Laser Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 286
Figure 8 6: Holmium Laser Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (JP¥M) 287
Figure 8 7: Holmium Laser Equipment Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 289
Figure 8 8: Holmium Laser Fiber Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 292
Figure 8 9: Stone Fragment Retrieval Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 295
Figure 8 10: Stone Fragment Retrieval Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (JP¥M) 295
Figure 8 11: Total Stone Fragment Retrieval Device Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 297
Figure 8 12: Nitinol Stone Fragment Retrieval Device Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 299
Figure 8 13: Stainless Steel Stone Fragment Retrieval Device Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 301
Figure 8 14: Ureteral Stent Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 303
Figure 8 15: Ureteral Guidewire Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 305
Figure 8 16: Drivers and Limiters, Stone Management Device Market, Japan, 2018 309
Figure 8 17: Leading Competitors, Stone Management Device Market, Japan, 2019 314
Figure 9 1: BPH Treatment Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 321
Figure 9 2: BPH Treatment Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (JP¥M) 321
Figure 9 3: TURP Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 326
Figure 9 4: TURP Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (JP¥M) 326
Figure 9 5: Monopolar Electrode Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 328
Figure 9 6: Bipolar Electrode Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 330
Figure 9 7: Laser BPH Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 333
Figure 9 8: Laser BPH Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (JP¥M) 333
Figure 9 9: Laser BPH Equipment Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 335
Figure 9 10: Laser BPH Fiber Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 337
Figure 9 11: UroLift Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 340
Figure 9 12: Drivers and Limiters, BPH Treatment Device Market, Australia, 2018 346
Figure 9 13: Leading Competitors, BPH Device Market, Japan, 2019 349
Figure 10 1: Erectile Dysfunction Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 354
Figure 10 2: Erectile Dysfunction Device Market by Segment, Japan, 2016 – 2026 (JP¥M) 354
Figure 10 3: Inflatable Erectile Dysfunction Device Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 358
Figure 10 4: Malleable Erectile Dysfunction Device Market, Japan, 2016 – 2026 360
Figure 10 5: Drivers and Limiters, Erectile Dysfunction Device Market, Japan, 2019 364
Figure 10 6: Leading Competitors, Erectile Dysfunction Device Market, Japan, 2019 366